PokerStars

Since 2001 www.pokerstars.com

PokerStars is the oldest of the big brands and, in autumn-2026 traffic rankings, sits third overall behind GGPoker and Winamax and second on cash-game traffic. It still offers the widest range of games online — mixed games, Stud, Zoom — plus the SCOOP and WCOOP series, but its fields are tougher than GGPoker's or WPT Global's, with a large core of experienced regulars.

—No ratings0 reviews

Download PokerStars

The official client — from the room’s site or the app store.

Details & conditions

GamesNLHEPLOStudMixed gamesZoomSpin & GoMTT
PlatformsWindowsMacIOSAndroid
DepositsCardsE-walletsBank transfer
Countries
Local sitesFranceSpainItalyDenmarkGermany
Min. deposit$10Account currencyUSD, EUR, GBP, CADLicenceMaltaFounded2001
Safety
18+ onlyBeGambleAware

Only play with money you can afford to lose. The room will ask you to verify your identity before a withdrawal.

PokerStars bonuses and jackpots

PokerStars review

PokerStars is the oldest of the big brands and, in autumn-2026 traffic rankings, sits third overall behind GGPoker and Winamax and second on cash-game traffic. It still offers the widest range of games online — mixed games, Stud, Zoom — plus the SCOOP and WCOOP series, but its fields are tougher than GGPoker's or WPT Global's, with a large core of experienced regulars.

Cash rake is 5% (slightly lower at some micro stakes), and from mid stakes upwards the caps are clearly lower than GGPoker's. The weak spot is rewards: for most players the Stars Rewards chests return noticeably less than GG's Ocean Rewards or ACR's programme.

PokerStars allows trackers such as PokerTracker and Hold'em Manager, with rules on what a HUD may display. Licences in many regulated markets and a long payout record make it one of the safest choices, but several European countries and US states play in ring-fenced pools. It suits players who value reliability and game variety over the softest possible field.

Pros

  • Second-largest cash-game traffic, with action at every stake
  • Lower rake caps than GGPoker from mid stakes upward
  • Trackers and HUDs allowed, within Stars' display rules
  • Widest game selection plus the SCOOP and WCOOP series
  • Licensed in many regulated markets with a long payout record

Cons

  • Low effective rakeback for regulars compared with GGPoker and ACR
  • Tougher fields than GGPoker or WPT Global
  • Ring-fenced pools in several countries split the player base

PokerStars reviews

Write a PokerStars review

Sign in to leave a review. One player — one review.

No reviews yet. Be the first!